We are entering, we are told, a post-liberal age. Authoritarian populism is in the political ascendant, and notions of permissiveness, multiculturalism and “identity politics” have allegedly failed us, meaning that we must now fall back on some notion of tradition. However, it’s not only the usual, conservative suspects who have got on board with this argument, but centrist politicians who, at least notionally, are hostile to the likes of Donald Trump and UKIP.

Authentocrats examines this populism of the centre, and exposes how its spurious concern for “real people” is part of a broader turn within British culture (as exemplified in the brute masculinity of Daniel Craig’s James Bond, the allegedly “progressive” patriotism of nature writing, and a televisual obsession with the World Wars), as it withdraws from the openness of the Nineties under the bad-faith supposition that there’s nowhere to go but backwards.

In their declaration that the left can only save itself by becoming less liberal, Authentocrats charges liberals themselves with fuelling the post-liberal turn, and asks where the space might be found for an alternative.

Praise for Authentocrats:

“A bracing corrective to a political discourse awash with specious appeals to imagined communities, a timely reminder that what we think of as “real” – in culture as in art – is often mere fiction.” – Guardian

“An often humorous but always precise takedown of modern politics’ obsession with authenticity.” – Vice

“One important function of Authentocrats is the staging-post in cultural criticism that it hopefully represents, post Corbyn and post post-politics, where it’s valid to talk directly about politics and left-populism without being deemed embarrassingly passé.” – Rhian E. Jones, New Socialist

“A wide-ranging and informed analysis of the way in which a brand of provincial, white working class experience is both privileged and distorted by politicians and journalists who aspire to appear credible outside of Westminster.” – Minor Literatures